Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 4/29/1986
State v. Wiltse
Citations
- 386 N.W.2d 315
- 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 4268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that “it is difficult to imagine a situation where, when an essential element of a crime turns on the presence of a defendant, the defendant could be prevented from explaining his presence at the scene to the jury”
- reversing a trial based on stipulated facts for a jury trial after a valid waiver because of a prejudicial pre-trial suppression order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.