State v. Wilson
Citations
- 73 Kan. 334
- 80 P. 639
- 1906 Kan. LEXIS 256
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Statutory Construction — Statute Prohibiting Combinations Not Repealed by Subsequent Enactment. Chapter 158 of the Laws of 1891 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §§2439-2441.), prohibiting combinations to prevent competition among persons engaged in buying or selling live stock, is not superseded by the general antitrust law of 1897 (Laws 1897, ch. 265; Gen. Stat. 1901, §§ 7864-7874), but is still in force. (See post, p. 343.)</p> <p>2. Contracts — Commissions for Buying and Selling Live Stock —Legislative Restrictions. The intention of the legislature as to restrictions to be placed upon agreements .among persons engaged in buying and selling live stock for others for the control of the commissions to be charged must be determined from the act of 1891, above cited, having specific relation thereto, and not from the general antitrust act of 1897 or from that of 1889 (Laws 1889, ch. 257; Gen. Stat. 1901, §§ 2430-2438).</p> <p>3. Monopolies — Dealing in Live Stock — Statute Construed. The act of 1891 above cited forbids agreements to maintain minimum rates of commission for services in the sale of live stock for others, but contains no such prohibition as to agreements concerning charges to be made for services in purchasing live stock.</p> <p>4..- Mortgage Given to Secure Purchase-money and Commissions — Validity. Where a member of an association having for one of its purposes the maintenance of a minimum rate of charges for services in buying or selling live stock for others purchases cattle for another, and in pursuance of a bylaw of such association charges .a commission for such services at the rate of fifty cents per head, which is included in the amount of a note and mortgage given to such member of such association by the purchaser in payment for such cattle, such mortgage is not on account thereof rendered void by the provisions of any of the statutes above cited.</p> <p>5. Criminal Law — Obtaining Money'by False Pretenses — Information. I
Judges: Mason
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Duluth Board of TradeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1909-05-07· cited 34×
- Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-03-05· cited 19×
- Hutchins v. StanleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-02-08· cited 14×
- Okerberg v. CrableSupreme Court of Kansas· 1959-07-10· cited 11×
- State v. Glenn Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1910-11-05· cited 10×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-11-10· cited 8×
- Greenwood County Bank v. O. B. Walker Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1912-12-07· cited 7×
- State v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court· 1953-02-27· cited 5×
- Gard v. Estate of HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1931-02-07· cited 5×
- Boatmen's Bank of St. Louis v. FritzlenD. Kansas· 1909-12-13· cited 5×
- Boatmen's Bank v. FritzlenEighth Circuit· 1915-03-01· cited 5×
- Morrison v. BandtSupreme Court of Kansas· 1937-05-08· cited 4×
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-12-20· cited 4×
- Goo Wan Hoy v. McKeagueHawaii Supreme Court· 1918-04-18· cited 3×
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas· 1925-02-07· cited 3×
- Joslin v. Steffen Ice & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1936-03-07· cited 3×
- Wyrick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1932-11-22· cited 2×
- Anderson v. O'BriantCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1928-02-17
- State ex rel. Griffith v. Anthony Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1925-04-11
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hopkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1898-10-24· cited 173×
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1898-10-24· cited 117×
- State v. SmileySupreme Court of Kansas· 1902-06-07· cited 61×
- Hynds v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court· 1865-11-15· cited 45×
- Douthart v. CongdonIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-06-19· cited 38×
- Keller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1875-11-15· cited 20×
- State v. JackSupreme Court of Kansas· 1904-05-07· cited 20×
- Bick v. SealMissouri Court of Appeals· 1891-05-12· cited 19×
- State v. . GarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1887-09-05· cited 10×
- Keyes v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1902-06-19· cited 9×
- State v. SuppeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1899-05-06· cited 9×
- Deering v. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1843-04-15· cited 8×
- Cotten v. McKenzieMississippi Supreme Court· 1879-10-15· cited 8×
- Crystal Ice Co. v. WylieSupreme Court of Kansas· 1902-05-10· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.