Ohio Supreme Court· 4/25/1979

State v. Wilson

Citations

58 Ohio St. 2d 52
388 N.E.2d 745
12 Ohio Op. 3d 51
1979 Ohio LEXIS 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that the aggravated burglary statute does not deny equal protection, as it requires the State to prove the elements of burglary along with an additional element
A structure must be occupied as a permanent or temporary habitation, as aggravated burglary is designed to protect homes, not businesses
“A structure can be one that was occupied as a perma- nent or temporary habitation without being one … where at the time anyone is present or likely to be present. The con- verse is also true.”
“A structure can be one that was occupied as a perma- nent or temporary habitation without being one … where at the time anyone is present or likely to be present. The con- verse is also true.”
“A structure can be one that was occupied as a perma- nent or temporary habitation without being one … where at the time anyone is present or likely to be present. The con- verse is also true.”
“In proving burglary the state need only prove that the structure was a permanent or temporary habitation, or a structure in which any person is present or is likely to be present. It need not prove both. In aggravated burglary, under R.C. 2911.11(A)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Hebbert, Holmes, Lochee, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.