Skip to main content

State v. Wilson

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3768

Syllabus

Defendant's challenge—that his prison sentence was contrary to law—was not well-taken where the trial court considered the purposes and principles of sentencing listed in R.C. 2929.11 and the seriousness and recidivism factors listed in R.C. 2929.12, properly applied postrelease control, and imposed a prison sentence within the statutorily-permissible range.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.