Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/22/2021
State v. Wilson
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3768
Syllabus
Defendant's challenge—that his prison sentence was contrary to law—was not well-taken where the trial court considered the purposes and principles of sentencing listed in R.C. 2929.11 and the seriousness and recidivism factors listed in R.C. 2929.12, properly applied postrelease control, and imposed a prison sentence within the statutorily-permissible range.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court· 2017-12-19· cited 273×
- State v. CyrusOhio Supreme Court· 1992-03-11· cited 185×
- State v. Toles (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-10-04· cited 92×
- State v. OrzechowskiOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-26· cited 34×
- State v. StensonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.