State v. Wilson
Citations
- 91 Wash. 136
- 157 P. 474
- 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1027
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law — Former Jeopardy — Identity of Offenses — Particular Description. The dismissal of an information for stealing thirty sacks of “Hybrid” wheat, after jury sworn, does not bar the filing of a new information for stealing thirty sacks of “Jones Fife” wheat; since, while a particular description is unnecessary, if given, a variance is fatal, and a conviction of the one does not amount to conviction of the other.</p>
Judges: Mount
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hill v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1874-07-01· cited 40×
- State v. DyeWashington Supreme Court· 1914-09-02· cited 23×
- United States v. HowardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1837-10-15· cited 21×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1849-07-01· cited 17×
- State v. KinghornWashington Supreme Court· 1909-12-01· cited 14×
- Morgan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1878-05-15· cited 13×
- Hardy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1900-10-26· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.