State v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “it was error for the trial court to take the case from the jury by dismissing the action at the close of the prosecution’s case in lieu of giving the jury an advisory instruction to acquit because of insufficient evidence”
• “[I]t was error for the trial court to take 18 the case from the jury by dismissing the action at the close of the prosecution’s case in lieu of giving the jury an advisory instruction to acquit because of insufficient evidence.”
• “a defendant is not subjected to double jeopardy when he is granted a new trial because the trial judge disagrees with the jury’s resolution of conflicting evidence. . . . [H]owever, . . . when the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction, the defendant may not be retried”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lord v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 109×
• State v. Walker
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-07-27· cited 10×
• State v. Purcell
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 10×
• Leonard v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1998-08-12· cited 9×
• State v. Combs
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 4×
• Deshler v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1990-04-24· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1939-02-15· cited 29×
• State v. Busscher
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1965-11-12· cited 15×
• State Ex Rel. Haas v. Schwabe
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-12-02· cited 14×
• State v. Corinblit
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1956-06-19· cited 12×
• Washington v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 9×
• State v. Superior Court in and for Co. of Maricopa
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-06-05· cited 4×