State v. Wills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting state concession and reversing requirement to pay unitary assessments because former ORS 137.290 was no longer in effect when the sentence was imposed
• reversing imposition of assessment based on former ORS 137.290(2)(b) (2009), which had been repealed at the time of the defendant’s sentencing
• accepting state concession that the trial court erred in imposing unitary assessment because former ORS 137.290(2)(b) was no longer in effect when the defendant was sentenced
• accepting state concession that trial court erred in imposing unitary assessment because former ORS 137.290(2)(b) (2009) was no longer in effect when the defendant was sentenced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brooks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-26· cited 3×
• State v. Sasser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 2×
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-02· cited 1×
• State v. Roman-Gonzalez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-29
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-19