State v. Williams
Citations
- 235 N.E.3d 1074
- 2024 Ohio 469
Syllabus
Motion for new trial Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination confession attempted murder Crim.R. 33(A)(6) newly discovered evidence. Trial court's denial of defendant's motion for new trial is reversed. The defendant was convicted of attempted murder. Subsequently, the defendant's brother confessed to shooting the victim, in writing and orally during an interview with attorneys from the prosecutor office's conviction-integrity unit. The confessions are consistent with evidence presented at trial. These confessions amount to newly discovered evidence, and the court erred by denying the defendant's motion for a new trial.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. HattonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 113×
- State v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-08· cited 95×
- State v. BuschOhio Supreme Court· 1996-10-09· cited 94×
- State ex rel. Hinkle v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-10-22· cited 75×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-19· cited 16×
- State v. IrwinOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-09-30· cited 11×
- State v. HollinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-25· cited 8×
- Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. McElroyOhio Supreme Court· 2014-09-04· cited 6×
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-27· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.