State v. Williams
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 965
Syllabus
Appellant appeals from trial court's judgments, in two separate cases, finding him incompetent to stand trial and ordering treatment to restore his competency. The trial court's orders that appellant undergo a competency evaluation and scheduling a hearing were encompassed within the final order on appeal. The trial court did not err in ordering the competency hearing and did not abuse its discretion in requiring a competency evaluation. Appellant's claim that the trial court erred in denying his request to represent himself was outside the scope of the appeal. Judgments affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- State v. BockOhio Supreme Court· 1986-12-24· cited 231×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 2000-07-26· cited 213×
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court· 2001-05-23· cited 151×
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-11· cited 96×
- State v. UpshawOhio Supreme Court· 2006-08-30· cited 25×
- State v. HoughOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-13· cited 23×
- State v. FitzpatrickOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.