State v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in rape prosecution, it was reversible error for the state to cross-examine the defendant and to compel him to answer questions over objection to suggest he had permitted other little girls to call at his home for the past five or six years so that he could rape them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lovely v. United States
  Fourth Circuit· 1948-08-10· cited 213×
• State v. Saunders
  Utah Supreme Court· 1999-06-11· cited 96×
• State v. Start
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1913-05-20· cited 93×
• State v. Wareham
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-03-31· cited 71×
• Terry v. Zions Cooperative Mercantile Institution
  Utah Supreme Court· 1979-12-07· cited 67×
• State v. Doporto
  Utah Supreme Court· 1997-01-17· cited 51×
• State v. Sauter
  Montana Supreme Court· 1951-06-07· cited 41×
• State v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1972-12-20· cited 41×
• State v. Vance
  Utah Supreme Court· 1910-07-13· cited 16×
• State v. Winget
  Utah Supreme Court· 1957-05-09· cited 13×
• Pueblo v. Díaz
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1943-05-17· cited 1×
• People v. Díaz
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1943-05-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shaffner v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1872-07-03· cited 112×
• People v. Lane
  California Supreme Court· 1893-12-01· cited 38×
• People v. Tucker
  California Supreme Court· 1894-11-01· cited 20×
• People v. Stewart
  California Supreme Court· 1890-08-01· cited 17×
• Janzen v. People
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1896-01-20· cited 12×
• Sutton v. Johnson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1871-09-15· cited 8×
• People v. Bowen
  California Supreme Court· 1875-07-01· cited 7×
• Sullivan v. O'Leary
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1888-03-03· cited 7×