Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Syllabus

Devonta Edward Williams argues the trial court should have directed a verdict of acquittal on one of his attempted murder indictments because he sees no evidence he intended to kill the particular individual named in the indictment. We affirm because we are convinced there was evidence from which a jury could find Williams intended to kill the individual in question because the individual was within the zone of danger created by Williams' conduct.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.