State v. Williams
Syllabus
Devonta Edward Williams argues the trial court should have directed a verdict of acquittal on one of his attempted murder indictments because he sees no evidence he intended to kill the particular individual named in the indictment. We affirm because we are convinced there was evidence from which a jury could find Williams intended to kill the individual in question because the individual was within the zone of danger created by Williams' conduct.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-07-01· cited 444×
- State v. CherrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-11-29· cited 144×
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-03-12· cited 44×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-10-25· cited 44×
- State v. HepburnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-12-11· cited 36×
- State v. PearsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-03-23· cited 17×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-06-12· cited 12×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-12-14· cited 11×
- State v. GoodsteinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-06-15· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.