State v. Williams
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2022
Syllabus
JUVENILE COURT — SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION — BINDOVER — PROBABLE CAUSE — R.C. 2152.12: When the complaint filed in the juvenile court did not allege tampering with evidence and the juvenile court never considered whether probable cause existed for that act, the juvenile court retained exclusive jurisdiction over that act and the adult court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to convict the child for tampering with evidence.
Judges: Bock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-26· cited 801×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-09· cited 243×
- In re M.P.Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-02-25· cited 94×
- Steele v. Harris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-02· cited 26×
- State v. Smith (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-03· cited 26×
- In re D.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-30· cited 4×
- State v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-27· cited 2×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.