Missouri Court of Appeals· 12/3/1996

State v. Williams

Citations

937 S.W.2d 330
1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1958
1996 WL 688649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“A subsequent guilty plea pursuant to Alford eliminates any showing of remorse or taking of responsibility by the appellant”
\A subsequent guilty plea pursuant to Alford eliminates any showing of remorse or taking of responsibility by the appellant\
“the Supreme Court of the United States, in Alford, made it clear that a defendant has no constitutional right to have a guilty plea accepted, whether or not it is made pursuant to Alford.”
when plea agreement is reached with a defendant who initially agrees to plead guilty, but who subsequently agrees to a plea agreement pursuant to Alford, such action “eliminates any showing of remorse or taking of responsibility by the appellant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crane, Pudlowski, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.