State v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Therefore, pursuant to the rules of statutory construction, La. R.S. 40:991 should not be read to restrict the sources of evidence a defendant may use to establish that he possessed a validly issued prescription.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Tran
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-04-24· cited 30×
• State v. Reyer
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2013-11-20· cited 4×
• State v. Broyard
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2015-12-23· cited 2×
• State v. Ruth
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-08-06· cited 1×
• State v. Rainey
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-09-17· cited 1×
• State v. LeBlanc
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2015-08-20
• State v. Ioveniti
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2018-02-07

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Love
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2003-05-23· cited 244×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2004-07-06· cited 90×
• State v. Sorden
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2010-08-04· cited 39×
• Combs v. Hartford Ins. Co.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1989-05-16· cited 35×
• Cross v. Cutter Biological, Div. of Miles Inc.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1996-05-29· cited 27×
• State v. Ramirez
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2008-01-09· cited 18×
• State v. Kitchens
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2010-03-24· cited 10×
• Armand v. Lady of the Sea General Hospital
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2011-12-21· cited 8×