Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 4873

Syllabus

CRIMINAL-SENTENCING-CONSECUTIVE SENTENCE-MAXIMUM SENTENCE - Where trial court made required findings for consecutive sentence in open court, the failure to incorporate the statutory findings in the sentencing entry is a simple clerical mistake therefore, we instruct the trial court to issue a nunc pro tunc sentencing entry that includes the required findings to accurately reflect the sentence imposed on the record. Given our required deference to the trial court's discretion in formulating appropriate sentences, we cannot conclude Appellant's maximum sentence is unsupported by the record.

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.