Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/26/2019
State v. Williams
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3026
Syllabus
Appellant's prison sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law where the trial court expressly considered the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, as well as the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12, prior to imposing a sentence that was within the applicable statutory range. Thus, the trial court's judgment is affirmed.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. HintonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-25· cited 115×
- State v. ConnorsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-27· cited 29×
- State v. ParksOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-14· cited 12×
- State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.