Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3026

Syllabus

Appellant's prison sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law where the trial court expressly considered the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, as well as the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12, prior to imposing a sentence that was within the applicable statutory range. Thus, the trial court's judgment is affirmed.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.