Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 2015 ND 103
  • 862 N.W.2d 831
  • 2015 N.D. LEXIS 103
  • 2015 WL 1914443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that area immediately outside door of condominium unit was not within curtilage under Fourth Amendment
  • observing that the Dunn factors are “insufficient” to gauge whether a condominium building hallway is curtilage
  • observing that the Dunn factors are “insufficient” to gauge whether a condominium building hallway is curtilage
  • interest in common hallway was not exclusive and therefore the hallway “was not curtilage”
  • in a post-Jardines case involving a narcotics dog sniffing in the common hallway of a condominium complex, “the condominium building’s common hallway was not curtilage,” so the canine sniff did not constitute a search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kapsner, Vande Walle, McEvers, Crothers, Sand-Strom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.