Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 406 A.2d 375
  • 137 Vt. 360
  • 1979 Vt. LEXIS 1000

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that inconsistency between State’s formal charge and State’s proof as to date of alleged act rendered conviction void, and noting that “time of commission is not an essential element calling for precise proof as pleaded”
  • “mere assertions of criminal activities” may not be used “in any way in aid of determining [sentencing] disposition”
  • where improper hearsay evidence presented at sentencing concerning criminal acts for which defendant was never charged or convicted, matter reversed and remanded for resentencing before different judge
  • where improper hearsay evidence presented at sentencing concerning criminal acts for which defendant was never charged or convicted, matter reversed and remanded for resentencing before different judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, C. J., and Daley, Larrow, Billings and Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.