Nebraska Supreme Court· 2/6/2009

State v. Williams

Citations

277 Neb. 133
761 N.W.2d 514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing courts will not “change the law because of what the State perceives as abuse by criminal defendants” in speedy trial context
“[p]ursuant to § 29-1207(4)(a), it is presumed that a delay in hearing defense pretrial motions is attributable to the defendant unless the record affirmatively indicates otherwise”
time excludable from statutory 6-month speedy trial period initiated by defendant’s plea in abatement began day after plea filed and ended when trial court overruled plea
where further proceedings are to be had following interlocutory appeal, for speedy trial purposes, period of time excludable due to appeal concludes when district court first reacquires jurisdiction over case by taking action on mandate of appellate court
discovery motion created excludable period for speedy trial calculation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heavican

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.