Supreme Court of Missouri· 5/25/2010

State v. Williams

Citations

313 S.W.3d 656
2010 Mo. LEXIS 136
2010 WL 2103044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “the evidence provided a basis for the jury to acquit [the defendant] of robbery in the second degree and convict him of felony stealing.”
holding that “the evidence provided a basis for the jury to acquit [the defendant] of robbery in the second degree and convict him of felony stealing.”
reversing a conviction for second-degree robbéry because the “trial court erred in not submitting the [lesser-included] stealing instruction to the jury.”
\The jurors could have ... disbelieved [the victim's] testimony about the use of physical force.\
trial court’s failure to give requested lesser-included offense in struction requires new trial
“A jury may accept part of a witness’s testimony, but disbelieve other parts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zel M. Fischer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.