Supreme Court of Florida· 12/8/1983
State v. Williams
Citations
- 443 So. 2d 952
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- legality of monitoring of phone call to target's home upheld, distinguishing Sarmiento
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boyd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-29· cited 76×
- The Florida Bar v. McClureSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-17· cited 13×
- Morris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-05· cited 8×
- Welker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-04-01· cited 6×
- Powe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-09· cited 1×
- Waters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-08· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LavazzoliSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-07· cited 95×
- State v. SarmientoSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-01-15· cited 82×
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-07-15· cited 23×
- Jacobs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-14· cited 20×
- Morningstar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-09-23· cited 18×
- State v. ShaktmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-14· cited 13×
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-24· cited 8×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-13· cited 5×
- State v. VanyoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.