State v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Williams points out that Act 192 of 1993 amends § 5-4-301 (a)(1)(F) and § 5-4-104(e)(1)(F
• “Williams points out that Act 192 of 1993 amends § 5-4-301 (a)(1)(F) and § 5-4-104(e)(1)(F) to remove the language from the two statutes which prohibited trial courts from imposing suspended imposition of sentence or probation of controlled substance offenders. This is true.”
• permitting appeal, despite precedent, to perpetuate uniformity in sentencing
• permitting appeal, despite precedent, to perpetuate uniformity in sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Elders v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-06-12· cited 15×
• State v. Knight
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-10-03· cited 14×
• State v. Pinell
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-05-08· cited 11×
• State v. Dennis
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-09-26· cited 9×
• Cook v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1994-06-22· cited 8×
• State v. Landis
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-02-07· cited 4×
• Scissom v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2006-03-15· cited 2×
• State v. Payton
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2015-05-14· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Townsend
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-10-18· cited 34×
• Hunter v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1983-02-21· cited 23×
• State v. Whale
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-11-01· cited 8×