State v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Parolees] have accepted the favor of parole subject to that degree of surveillance and search required under the circumstances for the effective supervision of the parolee and the protection of the public.”
• sufficient information to arouse suspicion
• sufficient information to arouse suspicion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Oregon v. Elstad
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
• State Of Iowa Vs. James Maximiliano Ochoa
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2010-12-17· cited 162×
• State of Iowa v. Isaac Andrew Baldon III
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2013-04-19· cited 132×
• State v. Rellihan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-11-15· cited 29×
• State v. Gallagher
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 22×
• State v. Griffin
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1985-09-12· cited 19×
• State v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 15×
• State v. Gordon
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1975-07-07· cited 15×
• State v. Fetterhoff
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-11-03· cited 12×
• Marrs v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-12-07· cited 11×
• People v. Elliott
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2012-03-08· cited 10×
• State v. Purvis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1975-07-07· cited 9×
• State v. Fakes
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-04-10· cited 9×
• State v. Wood
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1978-01-17· cited 6×
• People v. Ferguson
  New York Supreme Court· 1977-03-10· cited 5×
• United States v. Lewis
  S.D. New York· 1975-10-01· cited 4×
• Souders v. Kroboth
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1982-09-23· cited 1×
• People v. Santos
  New York Supreme Court· 1975-05-15· cited 1×
• State v. Tatum
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1981-08-10