Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 675 S.W.2d 499
  • 1984 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 2470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that issues that are not required to be filed in a motion for a new trial are “those that go to questions that could bring about an outright dismissal of a defendant’s conviction”
  • enhanced punishment laws, e.g., habitual criminal statutes, are not ex post facto laws, nor do they violate an accused’s due process or equal protection rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan, Walker, Byers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.