Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/7/1960
State v. Williams
Citations
- 116 S.E.2d 858
- 237 S.C. 252
- 1960 S.C. LEXIS 100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a formal declaration of arrest is not necessary to effectuate an arrest
- stating a formal declaration of arrest is not necessary to effectuate an arrest
- “To constitute an arrest, there must be an actual or constructive seizure or detention of the person, performed with the intention to effect an arrest and so understood by the person detained.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Oxner, Stukes, Taylor, Legge, Moss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CondreyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-04-01· cited 56×
- State v. CooleySupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-05-21· cited 45×
- State v. HymanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-22· cited 40×
- Mincy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1966-04-15· cited 30×
- Prosser v. ParsonsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-04-02· cited 25×
- State v. BrannonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-09· cited 25×
- People v. NunnCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-08-14· cited 15×
- State v. GervasioSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-07-19· cited 12×
- State v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-07-18· cited 11×
- State v. MimsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-09-03· cited 8×
- Castell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-02-14· cited 7×
- Castell v. Com.Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-03-31
- Branney v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court· 1963-04-30
- Commonwealth v. QuisenberryFairfax County Circuit Court· 1992-04-01
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-01· cited 150×
- State v. PluthSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-11-16· cited 54×
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1939-02-20· cited 37×
- Boyd v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1923-02-06· cited 25×
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1909-11-08· cited 10×
- Bradley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1953-05-15· cited 7×
- State v. DavenportSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1893-02-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.