Nebraska Supreme Court· 12/19/1997
State v. Williams
Citations
- 573 N.W.2d 106
- 253 Neb. 619
- 1997 Neb. LEXIS 247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an arrest warrant was not a detainer because it did not request the penitentiary to either hold the prisoner or notify Nebraska when his release was imminent
- concluding a state writ used to produce a defendant from federal custody was not a detainer triggering the IAD despite the federal institution's receipt of a state arrest warrant and forms utilized under the IAD
- concluding a state writ used to produce a defendant from federal custody was not a detainer triggering the IAD despite the federal institution's receipt of a state arrest warrant and forms referencing the IAD
- concluding a state writ used to produce a defendant from federal custody was not a detainer triggering the IAD despite the federal institution’s receipt of a state arrest warrant and forms referencing the IAD
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Caporale, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. QuintanaNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-01-12· cited 100×
- State v. TuckerNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-04-14· cited 78×
- State v. SteeleNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-03-30· cited 67×
- Shearer v. LeuenbergerNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-04-02· cited 37×
- State v. SklenarNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-01-14· cited 36×
- State v. RiegerNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-01-20· cited 21×
- State v. CliftonSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-06-01· cited 13×
- State v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-08-22· cited 11×
- State v. Castillo-RodriguezNebraska Supreme Court· 2023-03-10· cited 10×
- State v. MeyerNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-12-15· cited 7×
- State v. LauckNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-01-26· cited 6×
- State v. HernandezNebraska Supreme Court· 2021-05-21· cited 6×
- Olsen v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-03-27· cited 4×
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-01-19· cited 4×
- Mace v. MaceNebraska Court of Appeals· 2005-09-13· cited 4×
- State v. BarneyCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-06-26· cited 3×
- State v. LeatherwoodNebraska Supreme Court· 2025-10-31· cited 1×
- in Re Charles L. RyanTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-10-20
- Katarzyna Brozynski, Law Offices of Cornel Walker PC, and Cornel Walker v. Jared Kerney and Sheila KerneyTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2006-08-02
- People v. SpomerColorado Court of Appeals· 2025-04-10
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 731×
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 641×
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 495×
- Carbo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-01-09· cited 228×
- State v. JacquesNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-10-31· cited 202×
- State v. GibbsNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-10-24· cited 137×
- State v. LeGrandNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-12-22· cited 35×
- Allphin v. WardNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-11-14· cited 32×
- Hawk v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1949-11-10· cited 28×
- State v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-12-07· cited 25×
- State v. PriceNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 17×
- State v. HeislerArizona Supreme Court· 1964-03-25· cited 14×
- United States v. Charles Allan Bamman, United States of America v. Claude Howard HarlowFourth Circuit· 1984-06-18· cited 13×
- Tucker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-01-24· cited 11×
- State v. NearhoodNebraska Court of Appeals· 1994-06-21· cited 11×
- State v. BronkemaIdaho Court of Appeals· 1985-09-04· cited 10×
- State v. HarperNebraska Court of Appeals· 1993-11-16· cited 9×
- United States v. Leroy EaddySixth Circuit· 1977-11-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.