State v. Williams

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 4490

Syllabus

Crim.R. 29 sufficient evidence direct indirect and circumstantial evidence. The State showed sufficient evidence through witness testimony and surveillance video that appellant committed the crimes with which he was charged. Appellant, who wore an all-red outfit, was identified in the store surveillance video by a detective and his parole officer, who provided a previous picture of appellant wearing the same all-red outfit and standing in front of the same make, model, and color of car the shooter in the robbery fled in. Testimony about appellant's prior conviction was proper. The certified journal entry of conviction was admitted through the detective's testimony, and appellant chose to have the having weapons while under disability charge tried to the jury, rather than the bench.