State v. William Franklin Wolfe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a trial court implicitly denied a motion for reconsideration by entering an order dismissing the case
• observing that an appellate court must have jurisdiction over a claim to address the merits of the claim
• holding appeal timely from later order did not confer jurisdiction on prior appealable order from which no timely appeal was taken
• explaining that a timely notice of appeal is a necessary prerequisite to appellate jurisdiction
• concluding res judicata barred successive Rule 35 motions challenging trial court’s lack of jurisdiction
• applying res judicata to bar a second, successive Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion challenging the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).