State v. Wilkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[e]vidence that victim worked as an exotic dancer and prostitute was irrelevant and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Norris
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-11-19· cited 15×
• State v. Stewart
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-10-15· cited 13×
• State v. Turner
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2012-06-08· cited 9×
• State v. Knight
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-12-23· cited 7×
• State of Missouri v. William Ramsdell, Jr.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-03-26· cited 1×
• State v. Constance
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-04-03
• O'Shea v. Wills
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-05-29

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McKaskle v. Wiggins
  Supreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
• State v. Kemp
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2007-01-30· cited 105×
• State v. Hibler
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1999-09-21· cited 56×
• State v. Hampton
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1997-12-23· cited 36×
• State v. Thompson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-10-28· cited 22×
• State v. Boydston
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-08-23· cited 18×
• State v. Williams
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-01-04· cited 12×
• State v. Hurt
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1996-10-15· cited 12×
• State v. Freeman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-01-26· cited 11×
• Mehrer v. Diagnostic Imaging Center, P.C.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-02-22· cited 10×
• State v. Skaggs
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-04-30· cited 8×
• State v. Ecford
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-06-30· cited 7×