State v. Wilkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “before applying a special statute over a general statute the two should be read together and harmonized, if possible, with a view to giving effect to a consistent legislative policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Quinn
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-01-20· cited 183×
• State v. Smith
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-12-02· cited 48×
• State v. Kendall
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-01-04· cited 40×
• State v. Gabaldon
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-09-26· cited 30×
• State v. King
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-04-19· cited 28×
• Martinez v. Sedillo
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-01-18· cited 20×
• State v. Ellis
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-03-23· cited 16×
• State v. Johnson
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1977-09-13· cited 13×
• State v. Trujillo
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-04-11· cited 11×
• Lucero v. Northrip Logging Co.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-06-05· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• State v. Blevins
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1936-08-17· cited 80×
• State v. Riley
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-12-11· cited 31×
• State v. Blea
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-01-26· cited 23×
• State v. Barreras
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-05-28· cited 21×
• State v. Sanchez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-12-11· cited 14×