Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 3/1/1988
State v. Wiley
Citations
- 420 N.W.2d 234
- 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 261
- 1988 WL 14614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to ask rule 15.01 questions did not make defendant’s plea unintelligent in part because his five criminal-history points indicated “extensive exposure to [and knowledge about] the criminal justice system”
- plea agreement accepted by trial court; defendant moved for postconviction relief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edward D. Mulally
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
- Claude Francis Roddy, Jr. v. Harold E. Black, SuperintendentSixth Circuit· 1975-05-27· cited 129×
- John Kendal Stacey v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaEighth Circuit· 1986-09-24· cited 23×
- Michael Edward Carey v. State of MinnesotaEighth Circuit· 1985-07-05· cited 19×
- State v. DoughmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1983-12-07· cited 19×
- Jessee Travis Rouse v. William FosterEighth Circuit· 1982-03-01· cited 12×
- Clark v. SolemEighth Circuit· 1982-11-23· cited 10×
- State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-12-10· cited 7×
- Berg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-04-07· cited 6×
- Neeley v. DuckworthN.D. Indiana· 1979-07-12· cited 6×
- Dabon v. MaggioSupreme Court· 1983-04-18· cited 5×
- State v. BrantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-06-16· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.