· 4/6/2018
State v. Wilcoxin
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 1322
- 109 N.E.3d 739
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in finding a photospread not \unduly suggestive\ based on the appellant being the only person pictured with a \not accentuated\ \barely visible\ \teardrop\ facial tattoo. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.