Skip to main content
· 4/6/2018

State v. Wilcoxin

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1322
  • 109 N.E.3d 739

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in finding a photospread not \unduly suggestive\ based on the appellant being the only person pictured with a \not accentuated\ \barely visible\ \teardrop\ facial tattoo. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.