State v. Wilcox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A loss of use of property which is causally related to an unfair or deceptive 18 act or practice is sufficient injury to constitute the fourth element of a Consumer Protection Act 19 violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. State Water Resources Control Board
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-05-28· cited 106×
• People Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control Board v. Forni
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-01-23· cited 26×
• State v. Humphreys
  Washington Supreme Court· 1922-01-23· cited 14×
• State v. Dinas
  Washington Supreme Court· 1924-03-25· cited 8×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• O'Toole v. Faulkner
  Washington Supreme Court· 1904-03-17· cited 12×
• Orr v. Schwager & Nettleton, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1913-08-08· cited 9×
• State v. Hodoff
  Washington Supreme Court· 1915-12-08· cited 7×