State v. Wiggett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing interference with parental custody as removal of the child “with the specific intent to detain or conceal the child” from his or her parent or lawful custodian
• stating in the discussion of the crime of interference with parental custody that the “removal of the child from his or her parent or lawful custodian must be accomplished with the specific intent to detain or conceal the child”
• acknowledging criminal restraint is lesser included crime of kidnapping but finding no error in failing to instruct jury when there was no factual question that defendant acted with specific intent to take baby in order to facilitate commission of crime
• Buggs court sought to define, distinguish “talcing” requirement of kidnapping from incidental movement that often occurs during robbery or rape
• Buggs court sought to define, distinguish “taking” requirement of kidnapping from incidental movement that often occurs during robbery or rape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).