Skip to main content

State v. Whitt

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 424

Syllabus

Sufficient Evidence; Manifest Weight; Aggravated Possession of Drugs; Failure to Comply with an Order or Signal of a Police Officer; Tampering with Evidence. A sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge argues that the State did not carry its burden of production at trial. A manifest-weight challenge argues that the State did not carry its burden of persuasion at trial. A jury could find that the defendant knew that an official investigation was likely or about to be instituted where the defendant began making sudden movements as soon as a police officer activated his lights to effectuate a traffic stop before he (the defendant) sped away from the police cruiser.

Judges: Willamowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.