State v. Whitt
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 424
Syllabus
Sufficient Evidence; Manifest Weight; Aggravated Possession of Drugs; Failure to Comply with an Order or Signal of a Police Officer; Tampering with Evidence. A sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge argues that the State did not carry its burden of production at trial. A manifest-weight challenge argues that the State did not carry its burden of persuasion at trial. A jury could find that the defendant knew that an official investigation was likely or about to be instituted where the defendant began making sudden movements as soon as a police officer activated his lights to effectuate a traffic stop before he (the defendant) sped away from the police cruiser.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. Straley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-05-29· cited 146×
- State v. SullivanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-11· cited 91×
- State v. HarveyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-03· cited 48×
- State v. BanksOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-03· cited 44×
- State v. RandleOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-22· cited 32×
- State v. RicheyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-26· cited 28×
- State v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-12-06· cited 26×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-11· cited 10×
- State v. DanielsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-22· cited 9×
- State v. CarrollOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-29· cited 9×
- State v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-07· cited 8×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.