Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/21/2019

State v. Whitsel

Citations

2019 Ohio 4313

Syllabus

Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law where the trial court sentenced appellant within the permissible statutory range after considering the presentence-investigative report (\PSI\), the purposes and principles of sentencing, and the relevant seriousness and recidivism factors.

Judges: Ringland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Brandenburg (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-05-17· cited 73×
State v. Harp
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-11· cited 60×
State v. Stubbs
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-26· cited 41×
State v. Stamper
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-23· cited 34×
State v. Abrams
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-13· cited 18×
State v. Landingham
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-23· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.