State v. Whitney
Citations
- 66 Wash. 473
- 120 P. 116
- 1912 Wash. LEXIS 791
Syllabus
<p>Public Lands — School Lands — Federal Grant — Construction— Grant in Praesenti or Futuro. The Federal grant to tbe state of school sections 16 and 36, by 25 Stat. at L. 676, §§ 10 and 11, whereby the land was “hereby granted” to the state, was a grant in praesenti, vesting title in the state, although the land was unsurveyed, in view of the provision of § 11 that such land shall not be subject to preemption, homestead, or any other entry, whether surveyed or unsurveyed, but shall be reserved for school purposes only.</p> <p>Same — School Lands — Grants—Withdrawal from Entry — Statutes — Implied Repeal — General Act Repealed by Special Act. The amendment of the general act of 1859, 11 Stat. at L. 385, which provided that school sections 16 and 36 shall be subject to the homestead or preemption claims of settlers where settlements have been or shall hereafter be made before survey of the lands in the field, by the act of 1891, 26 Stat. at L. 796, which added the provision for lieu sections by the states or territories, of other lands of equal acreage when such settlements have been or shall hereafter be made before the survey in the field, did not have the effect of impliedly repealing the special act of 1889, 25 Stat. at L. 676, granting in praesenti to the states of North and South Dakota, Montana, and Washington, school sections 16 and 36, and providing that the same shall not be subject to any entry whether surveyed or unsurveyed; as repeals by implication are not favored, and a special act will not be held to be impliedly repealed by a general law on the same subject, unless the intent to repeal is clearly manifest.</p> <p>Public Lands — School Lands — Grant to State — Compact with States — Effect of Subsequent Act. The grant to the states of North and South Dakota, Montana and Washington, of school sections 16 and 36, with the special provision that the same shall not be subject to any entry whether surveyed or unsurveyed, was a compact with the states that c
Judges: Morris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1916-06-09· cited 16×
- State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court· 1915-02-11· cited 15×
- State v. Hewitt Land Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1913-08-06· cited 12×
- Dallas v. SwigartNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1918-04-03· cited 6×
- State ex rel. Ford v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1912-01-25· cited 4×
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-07· cited 2×
- Thompson v. SavidgeWashington Supreme Court· 1920-03-24· cited 1×
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. State of Washington and Peter GoldmarkCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-07
- Ortman v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1919-01-09
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Leavenworth, Lawrence, & Galveston Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1876-04-10· cited 258×
- Railroad Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court· 1881-05-18· cited 131×
- St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1891-03-02· cited 119×
- New York Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1898-04-11· cited 97×
- Deseret Salt Co. v. TarpeySupreme Court· 1891-12-21· cited 63×
- St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court· 1885-01-05· cited 61×
- Hall v. RussellSupreme Court· 1880-01-18· cited 59×
- Missouri, Kansas, & Texas Railway Co. v. Kansas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1878-10-15· cited 55×
- Balderston v. BradyIdaho Supreme Court· 1910-01-22· cited 32×
- State ex rel. Arnold v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court· 1909-11-04· cited 30×
- Callvert v. WinsorWashington Supreme Court· 1901-11-27· cited 16×
- Brown v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court· 1960-10-04· cited 10×
- County of Cass v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1881-09-13· cited 8×
- Wheeler v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1893-02-08· cited 5×
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. MillerWashington Supreme Court· 1898-10-04· cited 3×
- State v. JohansonWashington Supreme Court· 1901-12-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.