State v. Whitney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 11(f) was satisfied where judge examined affidavit of arresting officer
• concluding that the elements of DUI, third offense, were “readily understandable”
• explaining that Rule 11(f) inquiry is meant to address the voluntariness of a plea
• stating that Rule 11(f) addresses “constitutionally required determination of voluntariness”
• stating that Rule 11(f) addresses “constitutionally required determination of voluntariness”
• while it is \better practice\ for court, when deciding whether to accept guilty plea, to explain to defendant elements of offense and factual allegations comprising offense, V.R.Cr.P. 11(f) \is not a per se rule\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Delisle
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-07-01· cited 102×
• State v. Yates
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-01-08· cited 43×
• State v. Cleary
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2003-02-07· cited 35×
• In re Stocks
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-03-21· cited 30×
• In re Anthony Bridger
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2017-08-25· cited 24×
• In re Hemingway
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-05-02· cited 15×
• In re Kenneth Barber, Jr., Theodore C. Smith, Jr., Danielle M. Rousseau, John Burke
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2018-08-10· cited 10×
• In re Carrie Newton
  Vermont Superior Court· 2012-06-27
• In re Benoit
  Vermont Superior Court· 2005-07-12
• Jones v. State of Vermont
  Vermont Superior Court· 2018-07-10

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCarthy v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
• United States v. Tucker
  Supreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
• Burgett v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,632×
• United States v. Winston Eugene Dayton
  Fifth Circuit· 1979-10-18· cited 239×
• James Edward Kennedy v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 1968-06-26· cited 42×
• Dr. George J. Beto, Dirctor, Texas Department of Corrections v. Don A. Stacks
  Fifth Circuit· 1969-02-28· cited 36×
• United States v. Lawrence Johnson
  Seventh Circuit· 1980-01-02· cited 35×
• In Re Dunham
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-06-01· cited 34×
• Swensen v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-09-26· cited 24×
• In Re Kasper
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-09-07· cited 23×
• United States of America Ex Rel. William C. Stubbs v. Vincent R. Mancusi, Warden of Attica Correctional Facility
  Second Circuit· 1971-04-19· cited 14×
• State v. Dowd
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-06-04· cited 14×
• State v. Gabert
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-06-30· cited 13×