· 2/27/1986
State v. Whitman County District Court
Citations
- 714 P.2d 1183
- 105 Wash. 2d 278
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the driver submits to an evidentiary breath test, the issue in both criminal and administrative contexts is the same
- where the driver submits to an evidentiary breath test, the issue in both criminal and administrative contexts is the same
- officer’s warning that refusal to take breath test “shall” be used at trial required suppression because statute said “may”
- implied consent statute requires that the officer shall warn driver that refusal to submit may be used in any subsequent criminal trial; officer has no discretion with regard to wording
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andersen, Brachtenbach, Callow, Dolliver, Dore, Durham, Goodloe, Pearson, Utter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.