Skip to main content
· 2/27/1986

State v. Whitman County District Court

Citations

  • 714 P.2d 1183
  • 105 Wash. 2d 278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the driver submits to an evidentiary breath test, the issue in both criminal and administrative contexts is the same
  • where the driver submits to an evidentiary breath test, the issue in both criminal and administrative contexts is the same
  • officer’s warning that refusal to take breath test “shall” be used at trial required suppression because statute said “may”
  • implied consent statute requires that the officer shall warn driver that refusal to submit may be used in any subsequent criminal trial; officer has no discretion with regard to wording

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andersen, Brachtenbach, Callow, Dolliver, Dore, Durham, Goodloe, Pearson, Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.