Skip to main content

State v. Whitley

Citations

  • 408 S.W.3d 305
  • 2013 WL 5204703
  • 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1072

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that counsel “is in the best position professionally and ethically to determine when a conflict of interest exists or will probably develop in the course of atrial.”
  • finding the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim not cognizable on direct appeal despite being framed as trial-court error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amburg, Cohen, Gaertner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.