Skip to main content

State v. Whitfield

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 685

Syllabus

No speedy-trial violation occurred where the trial court postponed appellant's trial date due to appointed counsel's motion to withdraw and the appointment of new counsel. Speedy-trial time was tolled during the delay at issue pursuant to R.C. 2945.72(E), which tolls speedy-trial time for any period of delay \necessitated\ by a defendant's motion. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.