State v. White Face

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because “the State invited the jury to convict on either incident” of child abuse, it could not “be reasonably certain that White Face was found guilty by a unanimous jury”
• holding that because “the State invited the jury to convict on either incident” of child abuse, it could not “be reasonably certain that White Face was found guilty by a unanimous jury”
• indicating the trial court should instruct sua sponte on unanimity “when the evidence requires”
• “Defense counsel made clear to the court that unanimity was a concern and requested an instruction on jury unanimity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).