State v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that CARES was neither a victim nor suffered economic dam- ages for purposes of crime victim restitution
• concluding that CARES NW was not entitled to restitu- tion because it did not suffer economic damages under ORS 137.103
• concluding that CARES was not a “victim” under ORS 137.103(4)(b) where state did not explain “why its provision of services consti- tutes ‘economic damages’ within the meaning of the restitu- tion statutes”
• concluding under similar circumstances that CARES was neither a victim nor suffered economic damages for purposes of crime victim restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mann
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-11-29· cited 7×
• State v. Boza
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-08-26· cited 5×
• State v. Burris
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-10· cited 5×
• State v. Park
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-24· cited 3×
• State v. Avalos
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-30· cited 2×
• State v. Abeln
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-09· cited 1×
• State v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-13

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hale v. Groce
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-03· cited 111×
• State v. Ramos
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-02-19· cited 74×
• White v. Jubitz Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-15· cited 58×
• State v. Herfurth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-29· cited 23×
• State v. Daniel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-11-13· cited 2×