State v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• announcing the rule that the “shoplifting statute creates a separate and distinct offense from that denounced by the general theft statute” but providing no facts concerning the circumstances under which the defendant was found guilty of larceny

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Zuck
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-15· cited 115×
• Carter v. Com.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2010-06-10· cited 51×
• Welch v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-12-22· cited 47×
• State v. McCann
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2001-04-17· cited 42×
• State v. Anderson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-01-19· cited 15×
• State v. Robertson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-12-31· cited 7×
• State v. McGowan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-01-05· cited 5×
• State v. Vaughan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-09-20· cited 2×
• State v. McCann
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-07-18· cited 1×
• State v. Dawes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-30