Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 11/2/2007
State v. White
Citations
- 261 S.W.3d 65
- 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 8693
- 2007 WL 3225436
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “neither the statute nor any opinion of which we are aware establishes a time limit for the State to prove that the prosecuting attorney did in fact properly authorize the appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Patterson, Puryear, Pemberton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MullerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-01· cited 132×
- State v. DemaretCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-01-18· cited 35×
- State v. SheltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-05-13· cited 17×
- State v. BlankenshipCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-10-06· cited 12×
- State v. WhiteTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-08-31· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.