South Dakota Supreme Court· 9/27/1995
State v. White
Citations
- 538 N.W.2d 237
- 1995 S.D. LEXIS 120
- 1995 WL 568731
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- admitting other act evidence of a subsequent rape of another victim under similar circumstances to prove specific intent
- discussing State v. Downing, 511 P.2d 638 (Ariz. 1973) and State v. Morgan, 485 P.2d 1371 (Kan. 1971), in which the Supreme Courts of Arizona and Kansas held that evidence of rapes committed after the rapes the defendants were on trial for was admissible to show plan or scheme
- defendant's prior acts were relevant as course of conduct, an element of stalking charge
- “If a rapist’s method of operation is calculated to create the appearance of consent by the victim, similar acts evidence may be admitted to negate the defense of consent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Konenkamp, Miller, Anderson, Sabers, Amundson, Gilbertson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-04-14· cited 92×
- State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-05-22· cited 85×
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-06-30· cited 74×
- State v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-03-29· cited 57×
- State v. ChamleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-08-20· cited 45×
- Blaylock v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-02-17· cited 33×
- State v. Medicine EagleSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-08-07· cited 29×
- Novak v. McEldowneySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-12-23· cited 27×
- State v. LoftusSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-07-16· cited 25×
- State v. FowlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-06-26· cited 23×
- State v. SteichenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-12-23· cited 21×
- Bad Wound v. Lakota Community Homes, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-12-29· cited 17×
- State v. HenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-08-28· cited 16×
- State v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-08-19· cited 13×
- State v. WaughSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-11-02· cited 11×
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-01-18· cited 11×
- State v. EvansSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-02-24· cited 11×
- State v. ArmstrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-12-15· cited 8×
- St. Cloud v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-05-29· cited 5×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-04-27· cited 627×
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-07· cited 231×
- State v. SaltarelliWashington Supreme Court· 1982-12-16· cited 227×
- Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1974-11-18· cited 137×
- United States v. HamFourth Circuit· 1993-07-01· cited 119×
- State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court· 1979-12-18· cited 101×
- State v. MeansSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-02-27· cited 93×
- State v. WillisSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 74×
- State v. BaskerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-04-10· cited 74×
- State v. ChampagneSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-05-04· cited 70×
- State v. DaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-04-27· cited 69×
- State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 67×
- Charles E. Oliphant v. Theodore Koehler, Warden, Marquette House of Corrections and Branch PrisonSixth Circuit· 1979-03-06· cited 58×
- State v. KleinSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-07-12· cited 54×
- State v. SteeleSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-01-05· cited 53×
- State v. HolterSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-11-30· cited 51×
- State v. HarrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-01-06· cited 51×
- State v. BawdonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-04-23· cited 44×
- State v. HeftelSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-03-16· cited 43×
- State v. HansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-05-16· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.