State v. Whisman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the harm a defendant seeks to avoid must be present and impending; “a threat of future injury [is] insufficient”
• the harm a defendant seeks to avoid must be present and impending; “a threat of future injury [is] insufficient”
• “a threat of future injury [is] insufficient”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Boldt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-18· cited 17×
• State v. Marsh
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-03-06· cited 9×
• State v. McPhail
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-19· cited 5×
• State v. Clowes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-01-24· cited 4×
• State v. Troen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-02-14· cited 4×
• City of Eugene v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-08· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Luther
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1975-08-20· cited 59×
• People v. Harmon
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1974-05-30· cited 46×
• People v. Harmon
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1975-08-20· cited 27×
• State v. Matthews
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-09-26· cited 21×
• State v. Fitzgerald
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-08-27· cited 18×
• People v. Brown
  New York Supreme Court· 1972-05-19· cited 7×