State v. Wheeler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exercising discretion to correct plain error imposing court-appointed attorney fees and “indigent contribution”
• The statute giving courts the authority to impose a fine \requires only that the court consider the defendant's financial resources in deciding whether to include a fine (and its amount) in the defendant's sentence\ (emphasis in original)
• error was not apparent on the record because the statute requires only that the court consider the defendant’s finan- cial resources in deciding whether to include a fine, and the record did not reflect whether the court failed to do that
• error was not apparent on the record because the statute requires only that the court consider the defendant’s finan- cial resources in deciding whether to include a fine, and the record did not reflect whether the court failed to do that
• involv- ing fine imposed under ORS 161.645

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Shepherd
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-01-29· cited 8×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-28· cited 6×
• State v. Manoff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-03· cited 5×
• State v. Seck
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-10· cited 5×
• State v. Deanda
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-28· cited 4×
• State v. Meyer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-28· cited 4×
• State v. Seidel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-17· cited 2×
• State v. Davidson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-13· cited 1×
• State v. Gonzales
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-04-07

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
• State v. Qualey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-11-29· cited 23×
• State v. Below
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-23· cited 7×