Skip to main content

State v. Wheeler

Citations

  • 89 Kan. 160
  • 130 P. 656
  • 1913 Kan. LEXIS 32

Syllabus

<p>syllabus BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Criminal'Law — Trial—Evidence of Unconnected Offenses by Other Parties — Error. On a trial for one offense, evidence tending to prove other distinct unconnected offenses by other parties with whom it was not shown that the defendant had associated, conspired, or was in any way connected, is irrelevant.</p> <p>2. - Same. Evidence that a defendant in a criminal action had been arrested and given bail for another distinct offense not connected with the one for which he is on trial, and that other persons, with whom it was not shown that he had conspired, associated, aided or been connected with, have been convicted of such other offenses, is irrelevant.</p> <p>3.-Same. In the light of the circumstances' stated in the opinion it is held that the admission of the irrelevant testimony referred to in the above first and second paragraphs was prejudicial error.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence of relationship to other criminals ought not to have been received
  • evidence of relationship to other criminals ought not to have been received

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.