Skip to main content

State v. West

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2583

Syllabus

Postconviction motion to correct void sentence standard of review. Appellant sought reversal and remand of trial court's denial of his motion to correct void sentence for the court to state its reasons for denying the motion. Appellant made no argument the denial was in error. Because the trial court had no duty to state its reasons in denying the motion and where review of the denial of a motion to vacate a void sentence is de novo, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judges: Sheehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.